DV Shipping
A supplier pushes back a dispatch date. Purchasing gets the message, but customer service still quotes the original delivery window. By the time the buyer asks for an update, the team has two versions of the same order.
A supply chain risk matrix helps you decide what happens next: which warning matters, who checks it and what action is available. For an e-commerce team managing international orders, those decisions connect supplier commitments to the information customers receive.
This guide uses a simple 3 × 3 model and four worked examples. You can copy the tables into your own working sheet and adapt them to your next order.
What belongs in a supply chain risk matrix?
Each row describes a specific event, its possible consequence and the response your team can carry out. “Supplier risk” is too broad to guide a decision. “The supplier has not confirmed dispatch by the agreed checkpoint” gives purchasing something concrete to investigate.
Start with one upcoming order. Its supplier, products, destination and planned dispatch date give the assessment a useful boundary. Then add the signal you will watch, a priority score, an owner and a deadline for action.
Consider a hypothetical order of 300 units scheduled to leave on Friday. If the supplier has not confirmed readiness by Wednesday afternoon, purchasing needs time to check the plan before customer service repeats the delivery estimate. That Wednesday checkpoint belongs in the matrix.
A simple way to score likelihood and impact
Use likelihood to describe how plausible the event looks from the evidence available. Use impact to describe what it would mean for this particular order.
| Score | Likelihood | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | No current warning or recurrence in the comparable records reviewed. | Can be resolved within the agreed buffer. |
| 2 | An unresolved warning or a previous occurrence in comparable orders. | Requires replanning, added cost or a revised customer update. |
| 3 | Repeated warnings or strong current evidence. | Could block release or delivery, or materially affect quality or the customer commitment. |
Priority score = likelihood × impact. In this model, 1–2 is low, 3–4 is medium and 6–9 is high.
| Likelihood / impact | 1: limited | 2: moderate | 3: major |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1: low | 2: low | 3: medium |
| 2 | 2: low | 4: medium | 6: high |
| 3 | 3: medium | 6: high | 9: high |
The scale and examples are an illustrative planning framework, not measured probabilities or a universal standard. Agree the definitions with your team. A mandatory release requirement or an unacceptable quality result can still require a hold at any score.
Four examples for an international order
The following scenarios show how a score connects to a response. Each one needs an owner with enough information and authority to take the next step.
1. The dispatch date is still unconfirmed
For the Friday shipment, the Wednesday checkpoint passes without confirmation. An illustrative likelihood of 2 and impact of 3 give a score of 6: high priority.
Purchasing requests a dated update and checks the available options with operations. Customer service receives the confirmed change before revising the buyer's estimate. A backup supplier is useful only after capacity, specifications, timing and any added cost have been checked.
2. A required document is missing
The release check finds an incomplete document set. A likelihood of 1 and impact of 3 produce a medium score of 3, but the required check still prevents release.
The operations lead obtains the missing file from its responsible provider and verifies it with the relevant specialist. This is where the release requirement takes precedence over the numerical priority.
3. Inspection finds a quality issue
Some units fall outside the specifications agreed with the supplier. A likelihood of 2 and impact of 3 produce a high score of 6.
The quality lead records the findings and holds the affected decision while correction or replacement is agreed. Any acceptance outside the original criteria goes to the person authorized to approve it.
4. The buyer receives tracking for only one parcel
The order is confirmed as two parcels, but the customer message lists one tracking number. A likelihood of 2 and impact of 2 give a medium score of 4.
Customer service checks which products belong to each parcel and corrects the message using the actual shipment records. If the second parcel's status is unknown, operations investigates before anyone promises an arrival date.
Copy this template for your next order
Use one row per event. Replace role names with the person responsible for your order, and give each checkpoint an actual date, time and time zone.
| Event and checkpoint | Consequence / score | Owner | Next action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dispatch unconfirmed by Wednesday afternoon. | Delivery estimate may change. 2 × 3 = 6; high. | Purchasing lead | Get a dated update; review options with operations before changing the buyer's estimate. |
| Required document missing at release check. | Release blocked. 1 × 3 = 3; medium, with hold. | Operations lead | Obtain and verify the file; escalate unresolved gaps before release. |
| Inspection result outside agreed specifications. | Affected units may be unsuitable. 2 × 3 = 6; high. | Quality lead | Record findings; agree correction or replacement and obtain required approval. |
| One tracking number in a two-parcel customer update. | Buyer may report a missing item. 2 × 2 = 4; medium. | Customer service lead | Check both parcel records; correct the message and investigate unknown status. |
Alongside the table, keep the assessment date, action deadline, backup owner, escalation contact and links to supporting records. A low score still needs an owner. Once an event happens, manage the issue rather than waiting to reassess its likelihood.
Keep the matrix connected to the order
Return to the Friday shipment. A supplier confirmation on Wednesday may resolve the warning. A revised departure date may require a new delivery estimate. A faster transport option may be available, but it also changes the order's economics.
Before approving that option, review the affected transport and handling charges. Our guide to calculating landed cost explains how to bring those costs into the calculation.
A useful review rhythm follows the order itself: assess risks before committing, check evidence before dispatch, act when a warning appears and review what happened after delivery. Keep a brief record of why a decision changed so the next order benefits from it.
Further reading
For other working formats, see Smartsheet's supply chain risk assessment templates.
Put one order through the test
Choose your next international order and review the four scenarios with purchasing, operations and customer service. Can each owner act using the information in their row? Resolve missing contacts, documents and approvals while there is still time to change the plan.
DV Shipping brings suppliers, orders and logistics into one platform for international e-commerce operations. Explore DV Shipping when reviewing how your team coordinates those steps. Keep this matrix alongside your order records, with clear ownership for each decision.